Friday, October 17, 2014

Final Project (final post!)



Instructional Design eCourse – Final Project

ONE: A description of your environment: your teaching scenario, learners, purpose or end goal, and timeline. Are you teaching face-to-face or online? Is this a tutorial or a course? A one-shot library instruction session? Be specific.
My focus for this course / final project is be the credit course I will be teaching in January at California State University, East Bay. It is a two-unit, freshman-level course. Each section has approximately 30 students. It is a 10 week course, and the instructor can choose how many of the weeks have an in-person meeting vs. "online meeting" (via Blackboard). At this point, I'm planning for 8 in person meetings/weeks (1 hour, 50 minute classes) and 2 "online" weeks (when students will be meeting with me to discuss their research projects, and class content will be available via Blackboard).  For the in-class meetings, we will be in one of the two library classrooms. Neither classroom is outfitted with computers, but laptop carts are available to provide laptops for students on the days they are needed. They do have furniture that can be moved to suit a variety of learning activities. There is projection capabilities for both the instructor and student presentations. 

TWO: Your learning outcomes. These should be based on the needs and expectations of your environment. Are these outcomes appropriate for your learners?

The learning outcomes for the credit course I’ll be teaching are derived from the ACRL Information Literacy Standards, and are as follows:

Upon successful completion of the course, the student will be able to:

1.     Determine the extent of information needed
2.     Access the needed information
3.     Evaluate information and it sources critically
4.     Use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose
5.     Access and use information ethically and legally and understand that there are ethical, legal, and socioeconomic issues surrounding information and information technology

These are the learning outcomes for the course that are shared across the twenty or so sections of the course that are taught each quarter. They are appropriate for the goals of the course.

THREE: How will you assess your learners? What formative and summative assessments would best fit in your teaching scenario? Do they align with your outcomes?
The summative assessment for the course is a signature assignment (a reflective essay) that is assigned in all sections of the course.  A rubric is used to score a random selection of assignments across the sections. 
In terms of formative assessment within the section I will be teaching, I will use and/or develop rubrics that relate to the student learning outcomes for the course and tie those to individual activities/ assignments so that students know what I am looking for and exactly how their work will be evaluated. Those rubrics will be shared with students in advance so they can check their own work prior to submitting it for grading. I think the suggestions in the Fink document to have students receive feedback on either a low-stakes assignment or a non-graded assignment prior to the first graded work would be helpful to demonstrate to students how grading/assessment will be performed in the course, so they can see the “rubric in action” if they haven’t already seen it in previous courses.

FOUR: Learning theories and other instructional approaches to implement. What learning theories best support your outcomes? How might you leverage these theories to develop content and assessments?
I think the constructivist approach best matches what I plan to use in the credit course. I will be designing activities that have students pull on existing knowledge and wrestle with questions/prompts that I provide in order to come to their own conclusions. Having as many hands on / exploratory activities as possible where the students are asked to complete and reflect on a particular task without a lot of prior instruction (demo-ing) I think it the best way for students to be able to internalize a particular skill / behavior with the hope that it will transfer to other, non-classroom contexts. Building reflection into the in-class learning activities will be one form of formative assessment, as well as have in-class learning activities that feed into the formal assignments / graded assessments for the course.
FIVE: What tools will you use to deliver this content and have learners interact with your instruction? What might work best and why?
For my final project, I can think of several educational technologies / tools that would be appropriate. First is Blackboard, the Learning Management System used on the CSUEB campus - though the majority of the course I will be teaching will be in person, there are a couple of "online" sessions for the course where I will be posting videos / screencasts / other content.  Blackboard will also provide the central "warehouse" for all of the instructional objects I want to share with my students. For those videos / screencasts, I may use Jing, which I've used in the past, or VoiceThread, which is new to me, but it is a tool that my library has a site license for and other instructors at my institution have used successfully.  I'll also use some of the basic functions of Blackboard like the forums, quizzes, and grading module to increase engagement with the instructional material and provide formative assessment opportunities.
SIX: Reflect on what you have learned. What has been most useful? What do you feel you are still struggling with? How has this course changed how you approach instruction?
I think this class has been incredibly helpful, especially in terms of directing me to resources that will continue to inform my instructional practice in the future.  I wish I had had the time to dedicate to completely mapping out my 10 week course as part of this course, but I haven’t been able to find the time to do that. I hope to carve out the time to do that in the next two months (before January and that first day of class rolls around!) and I feel like this course has given me some really helpful tools/guidelines to inform that work for me to head into the classroom with confidence that I’m providing an educational experience for the students that is interesting, thought-provoking, and is closely tied to the learning outcomes for the course with formative assessment opportunities that really help students to know what they are learning and where they are struggling, hopefully to help them all succeed in the course.
SEVEN: Finally, did you find any of your coursemates' blogs particularly helpful? Link to any particularly useful posts or entire blogs from your peers. What have you learned from your peers? Did you add any additional resources to the Zotero group that you find exciting or interesting?
I think I learned a lot from the different approaches that people take – we are all struggling with common issues, but we take different approaches to solve those issues. I’ve found several ideas that I’m going to try and implement in my own instruction (either wholesale or with some tweaking to better suit my “authentic teacher self” J).  As far as the Zotero Group, I haven’t explored it much at this point but I know that it will be a great resource as I work to map out my entire 10-week class as well as for future revisions to the class that I’m teaching.

Educational Technologies (Week 4)

What technologies (and these can be old, new, or emerging) might be most appropriate for your final project? Does your final project align with any of the trends represented in the Horizon Report you reviewed?  

For my final project, I can think of several educational technologies that would be appropriate. First is Blackboard, the Learning Management System used on the CSUEB campus - though the majority of the course I will be teaching will be in person, there are a couple of "online" sessions for the course where I will be posting videos / screencasts / other content.  Blackboard will also provide the central "warehouse" for all of the instructional objects I want to share with my students. For those videos / screencasts, I may use Jing, which I've used in the past, or VoiceThread, which is new to me, but it is a tool that my library has a site license for and other instructors at my institution have used successfully.  I'll also use some of the basic functions of Blackboard like the forums, quizzes, and grading module to increase engagement with the instructional material and provide formative assessment opportunities.

Will this application/tool enhance, improve instruction or motivate learners? What similar applications/tools are there to consider?
 I believe the use of all of the tools I mention above will enhance and improve the instruction for learners. I hope to use it in ways that continues their engagement with the material and each other outside of the classroom, since we only meet in person once a week.  I like some of the options in VoiceThread for interactivity with presentations / PowerPoints... I can't wait to learn more about it / play more with it!  It seems like a much more interactive option for that type of material than Jing. With Blackboard, there aren't really other options to consider, since that's the mandated LMS for my campus.

Monday, October 6, 2014

Week 3: Motivation

In reading Small's article on motivation, particularly the section on the ARCS Model of Motivational Design, I was able to identify practices that I already incorporate into my teaching practice as well as get ideas for new practices and sequencing of practices that might have the most beneficial impact on students in my classes.  One example in the reading was something I'd planned to pilot this upcoming term when I teach a credit course again, and that was in the category of "Relevance - Familiarity: presenting content in ways that are understood by and tied to learner's experience and values."  Related to the activity I discussed in my other week 3 post, I was going to "challenge" students at the beginning of each of our in-person sessions with an information problem, and have the students draw on their own experience to recommend an information source.  So, for example, the day of our first class, I plan to ask students to imagine that they need to recommend an information source to a friend that will help their friend find the location of our campus. Students will then recommend their favorite "map" information source, whether it is an app on their phone, a website they use, a trusty Thomas Guide in their car, some sort of way to navigate by landmark, etc. Then the students will be asked to explain the pros and cons to using the information source they've selected.  My hope is that this will get the students in the practice of thinking critically about information sources, including those that they've incorporated into their day-to-day lives. As the quarter progresses, the information queries will get more complicated, but still be "fun" or not too serious, so students can practice thinking critically (selected a source to recommend while weighing pros and cons) in a non-evaluative way. My hope is this will translate into them being more critical with the sources they select for the final project for the course (fingers crossed).  But, there were many more elements of the ARCS model that I plan to implement in my course, but I won't go into all of them here!

Week 3: Learning Theory

I'm a little late posting for week three because I spent the weekend prepping for a Sociology one-shot I taught this morning; I had the luxury of having 70 minutes (not 50!) and incorporated some "active learning" that I'd intended to bridge the students from "where they were" (Google, Wikipedia) to where I (and the faculty member) wanted them to be (peer-reviewed articles). The students have a 10-12 page research paper due in December. I think the approach that I took falls into the "constructivist" area, because I was asking students to apply prior knowledge to the task and raise questions as they encountered them.

The class activity (after some general introduction) was for students to work with a partner, and look at a list of the top ten Google results for a particular search (I'd printed out a screenshot of one in advance, so they'd all have the same results). They were to label the results as media sources, academic sources, or Internet/"Wildcard" sources (I'd earlier related Internet sources to "Wildcards" - I had the luxury of two Bay Area baseball teams recently participating in wild card playoff games so I was able to tie that concept to the idea that you don't know what you're going to get when you find something on Google). They worked in pairs identifying the source types. Once done, I asked them to take it a step further, and for those that they identified as Internet/Wildcard sources, I had them create lists of Pros and Cons for each source (there were three) of why they should use them for their research paper and why they shouldn't use them. After working with their partners, the class discussed the pros and cons as a larger group with myself and the faculty member chiming in as needed.  The students brought their own previous experience with sources to the discussion and had the opportunity to apply what they'd just learned by exploring some sources with their partner.

The students were incredibly engaged, and were asking questions about where they could find "true" scholarly sources (peer reviewed articles) since they weren't in the Google results.  This segued into the rest of the session, which was still collaborative with students as many of the students had some experience with scholarly research and were able to volunteer and share that information with their peers while the faculty member and I took more of a "guide on the side" approach.  It was super fun to teach and I'm going to think of ways to tweak it to have it be even more effective in the future - as well as develop assessments so that I can confirm what I think I observed in the classroom and learn more about which areas of the activity can be improved.